Brutal Ban E-Wallet Betting Makes Casino Stocks Slide

Executive summary

Philippine gambling-related stocks sold off after lawmakers pushed measures to restrict or ban the use of e-wallets for online betting, and regulators ordered mobile wallets to remove in-app links to gambling. Market leader DigiPlus Interactive (PLUS)—operator of BingoPlus/ArenaPlus—led the declines as legislative headlines intensified and liquidity dried up. In mid-August, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) directed e-wallets to unlink from online gambling within 48 hours, and PAGCOR later said online gaming transactions fell ~50% immediately after the unlink order—fueling further uncertainty about sector earnings and compliance pathways.

This deep-dive assembles the timeline, key proposals, market impact, and base-case scenarios so investors, operators, and consumers can navigate the months ahead.

The headline risk in one line

A bill (and companion proposals) to curb online gambling—notably by banning e-wallet betting—combined with a BSP order to remove in-app links to gambling, created a double shock: policy-risk repricing in equities and an abrupt disruption to online gaming payment pipes.

The fast timeline (June–August 2025)

• Late June–early July: Philippine senators and representatives file or float measures to restrict e-wallet use for online betting, including proposals to ban e-wallets from funding bets, raise the minimum gambling age to 21, and set a PHP10,000 minimum deposit to deter vulnerable players. Casino/e-gaming shares tumble; DigiPlus hits the 30% down limit intraday on July 3.
• Mid-July: Pressure builds; media tally double-digit declines for gaming names, with DigiPlus flagged as the worst-performing global casino stock after months of outperformance in 2024.
• Aug 14–16: The BSP orders e-wallets/payment apps to remove gambling links within 48 hours; GCash and others comply, cutting GLife links by Aug 16. Lawmakers and agencies signal more steps to follow; BSP warns AML concerns could rise if e-gambling isn’t curbed. PAGCOR estimates a ~50% drop in online gaming transactions post-unlink.

Bottom line: Policy momentum has shifted decisively toward tightening. Whether Congress enacts a narrow e-wallet betting ban or heads toward a broader online gambling prohibition, the payment rails are already changing.

What’s actually on the table? A plain-English explainer

1) Legislative proposals

Across both chambers you’ll find overlapping aims:

• Ban or restrict e-wallets (e.g., GCash, Maya) from being used to fund online gambling.
• Raise age limits (e.g., to 21).
• Set higher deposit thresholds (e.g., PHP10,000) to curb casual/top-up behavior.
• In some cases, full online gambling bans have been proposed.

At least one House measure seeks to reclaim financial tools from predatory gambling operators by blocking wallet integration, while a senator has filed a separate bill to criminalize various forms of online betting.

2) The central bank’s operational move

Independently of Congress, the BSP ordered all supervised e-wallets/payment apps to remove in-app links (icons/shortcuts) that route users to gambling platforms—effective within 48 hours of Aug 14. This was announced in a Senate hearing and confirmed by multiple outlets.

3) Early consequences

PAGCOR reported that licensed online gaming transactions fell ~50% after the unlink order. Law enforcement and industry groups warn of migration to illegal sites if restrictions aren’t paired with stronger enforcement and education.

Why the market reacted so violently

1. Payment friction = revenue risk. If e-wallets are the dominant top-up method, banning or unlinking them can reduce conversion rates overnight—even if bank transfers remain legal.
2. Multiple proposals = headline overhang. When bans, age hikes, deposit floors, and tax/IPO talk all hit together, the market prices worst-case.
3. Policy momentum + AML optics. The central bank framed the move within consumer protection and money-laundering risk management; regulators rarely “walk back” such steps quickly.

Case in point: DigiPlus (PLUS)—a retail-favorite in 2024—plunged on the initial bill headlines and stayed volatile through August despite buyback announcements and index reshuffling narratives.

Winners, losers, and the messy middle

Likely near-term “losers”

• Pure e-gaming operators relying on in-app wallet flows (top-ups via GLife/mini-apps).
• Wallet-integrated affiliates (traffic/UX advantage gone).

Possible “winners” or relative beneficiaries

• Integrated resorts (IRs) with on-property revenues (e.g., tables/slots, F&B, hotel), which analysts say could benefit on the margin if e-gaming demand softens and foot traffic returns to physical venues.
• Banks (traditional rails) if compliant bank transfers absorb part of the lost wallet flow—provided they enforce KYC/AML strictly.

The messy middle

• E-wallets: Removing links is straightforward; blocking all gambling-related payments is harder (merchant detection, off-platform URLs). Industry groups even argued wallets could remain useful enforcement tools if paired with data-sharing and geofencing.
• Consumers: Some shift to illegal sites has been reported—raising player-protection and AML concerns.

The stocks: what actually happened

• DigiPlus Interactive (PSE: PLUS)
  – Price action: Intraday hit –30% (limit) on July 3, then closed –14%; weeks later, Bloomberg flagged DigiPlus as the world’s worst casino stock YTD as the crackdown narrative deepened. As of late August, PLUS remained volatile in the mid-20s with a ~PHP120B market cap on PSE EDGE.
  – Why it’s critical: PLUS symbolizes e-gaming growth (BingoPlus/ArenaPlus) and sits at the center of the wallet-rails discussion.
• Bloomberry Resorts (BLOOM)
  – Spillover: While IRs are not the main target, equity beta kicked in; some analysts even noted brick-and-mortar could benefit from a tilt back to physical gaming spend.
• Sector pulse: Newsrooms and brokerage notes framed July as a policy-shock month for PH gaming equities with repeat selloffs when new ban calls surfaced.

Macro & policy context you shouldn’t ignore

• The Philippines banned POGOs (offshore operators) in late 2024; curbing domestic e-gaming is the next frontier for policymakers concerned about crime, social costs, and AML risk.
• BSP’s August order is aligned with this trajectory; lawmakers from both chambers have signaled more restrictions, not fewer.

Scenarios for the next 3–9 months

None of the below is investment advice. These are scenarios, not predictions.

Scenario A: Link ban remains; no outright payment ban (base case, near-term)

• What it means: E-wallets continue to withhold in-app gambling links, but lawmakers take months to reconcile bills. Gambling payments via off-app channels may persist under stricter monitoring, merchant coding, and KYC.
• Market impact: Earnings estimates for e-gaming operators reset lower, but a floor emerges if bank rails partially substitute wallet top-ups.

Scenario B: Targeted e-wallet funding restrictions pass

• What it means: Clear language prohibits wallet funding of licensed online betting. Operators must migrate users to bank transfers/cards with enhanced verification.
• Market impact: Lower conversion and higher churn initially; winners are those with best off-wallet UX and retention programs.

Scenario C: Total ban on online gambling

• What it means: Full halt to domestic e-gaming; enforcement ramps up; illegal sites surge unless countered by blocking, payments interdiction, and consumer education.
• Market impact: Severe hit to e-gaming revenues; IRs could absorb a slice of discretionary spend if macro holds, but overall sector multiples compress on governance risk.

For operators: compliance playbook (what you can do now)

1. Hyper-compliance with the BSP order. Document unlink timelines, internal notices, and testing logs; maintain a regulator-ready audit trail.
2. Payment diversification with safeguards. Where legal, shift to bank rails with strong KYC/AML, velocity limits, and affordability checks.
3. Risk and data governance. Tighten merchant category codes, enhance device/IP heuristics, and screen affiliates more aggressively.
4. Harden responsible-gaming (RG). Visibility for timeouts, deposit limits, self-exclusion, and age checks—and align verbiage to any new legal standards.
5. Communications cadence. Publish plain-language updates to reduce panic churn; clarify what’s changing (links) vs. what’s not (account security, withdrawals).

For e-wallets & payment apps: beyond unlink

• User safety UX: Proactive warnings around gambling transfers (where still legal), RG education, and hotline links.
• Merchant intelligence: Collaborate with PAGCOR/BSP to flag suspicious flows and block illicit sites.
• Data room for policymakers: Share anonymized trends (age bands, geo heatmaps, fraud rates) to inform smart regulation instead of blanket bans.

For investors: risk-management checklist

• Track the policy calendar. Committee hearings, BSP circulars, and Palace statements are your key catalysts. Headline gaps (Fri pm–Mon open) can be brutal.
• Model payment friction. For e-gaming names, sensitize ARPPU/MAU to lower conversion and higher churn; test –20% / –40% transaction scenarios given PAGCOR’s ~50% immediate drop datapoint post-unlink.
• Watch enforcement, not just laws. Link bans can bite even without new statutes; conversely, weak enforcement can blunt a tough bill’s impact.
• Balance sheet and buybacks. Cash-rich firms may buy back stock or pivot products; monitor disclosures and PSE EDGE.
• Cross-exposure. Some IRs have omni-channel strategies; stress-test how online turbulence changes visitor mix and junket/direct VIP dynamics.

Consumer angle: keep it legal, keep it safe

If you play—follow the law and use licensed channels only. Beware of illegal sites that promise easy access after the wallet unlink; they may expose you to fraud, data theft, and no recourse for disputes. PAGCOR and media reports already note illegal platforms picking up traffic—don’t be a statistic.

What experts and agencies are signaling

• Regulators: BSP is linking the wallet move to consumer protection and AML risks, and officials warn of reputational exposure if e-gambling isn’t contained.
• PAGCOR: Post-unlink, licensed transaction volume fell sharply; the agency is warning about illegal migration.
• Lawmakers: From targeted wallet prohibitions to total bans, a range of bills is live; at minimum, expect stricter controls.

Frequently overlooked nuance: “links” vs “payments”

The BSP’s order focuses on removing in-app links/icons that route users to gambling platforms. It’s not necessarily a blanket ban on all payment flows for gambling. Lawmakers are debating whether to go further and restrict funding transactions themselves. That distinction explains why stocks swung hard on legislative headlines (future payments risk), then again on BSP enforcement (immediate UX shock).

PAGCOR Guarantee Free Portal: Boosting Trust for Online Casinos

Media snapshot: what moved sentiment most

1. Bloomberg/Inquirer headlines (July 3–18): “Stocks plunge on bill to curb online betting,” “DigiPlus turns world’s worst casino stock” — these framed the selloff as systemic rather than idiosyncratic.
2. ABS-CBN/PhilStar (Aug 14–20): “BSP orders unlink within 48 hours,” “transactions down ~50%,” “illegal sites pickup” — these underscored real-world impacts.

Strategic outlook: three things to watch next

1. Bill language: Do final drafts ban funding, ban links, or ban online gambling outright? Each carries different earnings paths.
2. Enforcement toolkit: Payments interdiction, site blocking, KYC/AML harmonization, and consumer warnings will determine real-world effectiveness.
3. Quarterly prints: Expect volatile guidance from e-gaming names; watch for cost cuts, marketing pullbacks, and product pivots (legal, non-gambling adjacent).

Strong call-to-action

Stay informed, not spooked.

• Investors: Bookmark official BSP, PAGCOR, and Congress pages; track hearing calendars and company disclosures. If you want, I can prepare a one-page risk tracker (key dates, draft status, and catalysts).
• Operators & wallets: Audit your compliance logs today; publish a plain-language customer update and scale RG features.
• Consumers: If you ever see suspicious gambling offers after the unlink, report them; protect your identity and money.

Want a tailored checklist (investor/operator/consumer)? Say “Send checklist” and tell me your role.

Philippine gambling-related stocks slumped after lawmakers advanced measures to restrict—or outright ban—the use of e-wallets for online betting, while the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) separately ordered mobile wallets to remove in-app links to gambling within 48 hours. The dual shock—potential funding bans plus immediate UX disruption—sparked steep selloffs led by DigiPlus Interactive (PLUS), the bellwether for e-gaming via BingoPlus/ArenaPlus. Soon after the unlink order, PAGCOR said licensed online gaming transactions fell about 50%, intensifying earnings uncertainty and fears of user migration to illegal sites.

The article maps a June–August timeline: bills proposing e-wallet prohibitions, higher minimum gambling age (to 21), and large deposit thresholds; mid-August BSP enforcement; and cascading market reactions. It explains the key nuance that link removal is not the same as a payments ban, but Congress is debating whether to go further. The market’s violent move reflects three risks: payment friction (lower conversion and higher churn), headline overhang from multiple proposals, and AML/consumer-protection optics that are unlikely to reverse quickly.

Stakeholder impacts vary. Pure e-gaming operators face the toughest near-term hit; integrated resort (IR) operators could gain modestly if spend shifts back on-property; banks may pick up some flows via compliant transfers; e-wallets sit in a “messy middle,” able to comply on links yet still challenged to police transactions.

The piece outlines three scenarios: (A) link bans persist without a funding ban (base case), (B) targeted e-wallet funding restrictions pass, or (C) a total online gambling ban. It gives checklists for operators (hyper-compliance, payment diversification, RG hardening), wallets (merchant intelligence, user-safety UX), investors (policy calendar, friction modeling, enforcement watch), and consumers (play only on licensed channels; avoid illegal sites). The call-to-action urges readers to stay informed, document compliance, and report suspicious offers, noting that regulation—and equity pricing—will track how bills are finalized and enforced.

FAQs

Sources & further reading

• BSP e-wallet unlink order and 48-hour compliance reports; In-app link removal confirmed at Senate hearing. Bloomberg.comBloomberg Law
• Stock selloff on bill to curb online betting; DigiPlus named worst casino stock amid crackdown narrative. Bloomberg.com+1
• PAGCOR notes ~50% drop in online gaming transactions post-unlink; concerns about illegal site migration. Philstar
• Bill specifics (ban e-wallets; age/deposit changes); House/Senate proposals and full ban motions. InsiderPHInquirer.netGGRAsia

Note: Policy and market data can change quickly. Verify company disclosures and official circulars before making decisions.

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.